Abstract
Oxidative stress is a primary driver of aging, necessitating robust cellular adaptation mechanisms. While peroxisomal β-oxidation and proteasomal degradation are known to influence stress responses, their functional crosstalk remains elusive. In this study, we show that C. elegans acox-1.1 mutants, despite having a shortened lifespan under normal conditions, exhibit a paradoxical resistance to mild chronic oxidative stress (1 mM paraquat, PQ) compared to wild-type worms. This PQ-induced resistance in acox-1.1 mutants was independent of the canonical SKN-1 pathway but required the peroxisomal catalase CTL-3. RNA-mediated knockdown of ctl-3 largely abolished the stress resistance of acox-1.1 mutants, leading to rapid mortality. Proteomic and biochemical analyses revealed that acox-1.1 mutants possess reduced levels of PAS-5, a core 20S proteasome subunit, resulting in impaired proteasomal assembly and accumulation of ubiquitinated (Ub) substrates under basal conditions. Intriguingly, exposure to 1 mM PQ significantly reduced the Ub-smear in acox-1.1 mutants, suggesting a metabolic shift where the cell prioritizes ROS scavenging over ATP-dependent protein degradation. Under oxidative stress, acox-1.1 mutants bypass defective proteasomal machinery and redirect energy toward CTL-3-mediated antioxidant defense. This study identified a peroxisomal adaptation mechanism whereby reduced proteasome complexity, coupled with enhanced ROS-regulatory machinery, confers survival advantages under specific oxidative challenges.
Impact statement
Our study demonstrates that C. elegans acox-1.1 mutants adapt to peroxisomal β-oxidation deficiency by activating CTL-3-mediated antioxidant defenses and proteasome regulation, resulting in increased stress resilience under mild oxidant stress. These findings uncover a mechanistic link between metabolic dysfunction, ROS detoxification, and proteostasis, which offer new perspectives on cellular adaptation and organismal resilience.
Introduction
Peroxisomes are vital organelles responsible for lipid metabolism, detoxification, and redox homeostasis. A key function of peroxisomes is β-oxidation of very long-chain fatty acids (VLCFAs), a process that differs from mitochondrial β-oxidation by producing hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) instead of ATP [1, 2]. While H2O2 has long been considered a metabolic byproduct, emerging evidence suggests that it plays an integral role in redox signaling and cellular stress adaptation [3].
In Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans), acyl-CoA oxidase 1 (acox-1) catalyzes the initial step of peroxisomal β-oxidation, converting acyl-CoA into 2-trans-enoyl-CoA [4]. Loss of acox-1.1 results in metabolic dysregulation, characterized by lipid accumulation and increased oxidative stress, which may activate compensatory stress response pathways [5]. The disruption of peroxisomal VLCFA metabolism has been closely linked to oxidative stress and cellular dysfunction, as defective peroxisomal activity leads to reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and subsequent macromolecular damage [6, 7].
Oxidative stress exerts a profound influence on protein homeostasis (proteostasis) by altering protein conformation and increasing the accumulation of oxidized, dysfunctional proteins [8]. To counteract this, cells employ the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) and the immunoproteasome, which degrade oxidatively damaged proteins and maintain proteostasis [9]. Notably, oxidative stress has been demonstrated to modulate proteasome activity, highlighting its central role in cellular stress responses [10, 11]. The proteasome serves as a critical regulator of proteostasis, rapidly degrading oxidized and misfolded proteins under oxidative stress conditions [12]. Among its components, the 20S proteasome functions independently of ubiquitination, enabling a rapid and selective response to ROS-induced proteotoxic stress [13, 14]. Declining proteasome activity has been directly associated with aging and age-related pathologies, underscoring its essential role in longevity [15].
PAS-5, a regulatory subunit of the 20S proteasome, is indispensable for proteasome assembly and function [14, 16]. In C. elegans, pas-5 depletion via RNAi phenocopies the loss of pas-4, further emphasizing its role in proteostasis [11]. Previous work in an xpa-1 mutant background, using transcriptomic and proteomic profiling, revealed that pas-5 depletion triggered upregulation of other proteasome components, particularly pbs-4, in an SKN-1-dependent manner, indicating activation of oxidative stress responses when DNA repair is compromised [17].
A key regulator of oxidative stress resistance in C. elegans is SKN-1, the ortholog of mammalian Nrf2, which modulates antioxidant defense, detoxification, and metabolic homeostasis [18, 19]. Under acute oxidative stress, SKN-1 activation drives expression of canonical detoxification genes, such as gcs-1 and gst-4, enabling rapid clearance of ROS [18]. Under persistent or chronic stress conditions, previous studies have shown that SKN-1-dependent transcriptional outputs can be redirected away from classical detoxification genes toward pathways involved in metabolic adaptation and stress accommodation [20]. Consistent with this concept, chronic exposure to low-dose paraquat (0.25–1 mM) induces adaptive stress responses [21] and longevity-associated signaling in C. elegans, highlighting a mode of oxidative stress distinct from acute toxicity [22].
Recent advancements in optogenetic control of ROS production have further underscored the importance of precisely regulated ROS dynamics in metabolic adaptation and stress resilience [23]. The growing body of evidence supporting oxidative stress as a key determinant of lifespan regulation in C. elegans further strengthens the significance of these pathways in aging [24]. While oxidative stress, proteostasis, and peroxisomal metabolism are well-established players in aging, the role of the proteasome in integrating these pathways remains underexplored. Since PAS-5 is crucial for proteasome stability and function, its regulation under oxidative stress may uncover novel adaptive mechanisms contributing to lifespan extension. Recent findings suggest that peroxisomal dysfunction triggers compensatory stress responses involving proteasomal adaptation [25, 26]. However, whether PAS-5 directly contributes to oxidative stress resistance in acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants remains unknown.
In this study, we investigated the functional significance of acox-1.1 in oxidative stress adaptation and aging, specifically in the context of peroxisomal β-oxidation deficiency. We examined (1) the impact of acox-1.1 deficiency on ROS accumulation and oxidative stress resistance, (2) the reduced expression of the proteasome subunit PAS-5 and its impact on the accumulation of ubiquitinated substrates in acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants, the (3) acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants prioritize antioxidant defense over proteasomal activity under severe oxidative challenges, as evidenced by the reduction of Ub-conjugates. By elucidating the molecular crosstalk between peroxisomal dysfunction, oxidative stress, and proteostasis, our findings provide mechanistic insights into how metabolic defects can trigger adaptive stress responses that promote resilience against environmental stress.
Materials and methods
Maintenance of C. elegans strains
The C. elegans strains used in this study were N2 Bristol (wild-type) and acox-1.1(ok2257) mutant worms. All worms were cultured as previously described [27].
RNA interference (RNAi) experiments
RNAi was performed using the feeding method. The ctl-3(RNAi) clone was constructed by amplifying a specific genomic region (approximately 800 bp) of the ctl-3 gene from C. elegans genomic DNA using the following primers containing XbaI and HindIII restriction sites at their 5′ ends: forward, 5′-ACTTCTAGACCGCCGTGCTCACCGCC-3′ and reverse, 5′-TCTAAGCTTGTTCGAATGTCATCACTTG-3’. The resulting PCR product was digested with XbaI and HindIII and ligated into the L4440 vector at the corresponding restriction sites. The resulting construct was then transformed into E. coli HT115 (DE3) RNAi bacteria. For feeding RNAi experiments, ctl-3 RNAi bacteria clones were cultured overnight in LB medium at 37 °C. The cultured bacteria were then seeded onto NGM agar plates containing 1 mM IPTG and 100 μg/mL ampicillin to induce double-stranded RNA expression.
Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from age-synchronized worms using TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and purified with the RNeasy Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Reverse transcription was performed using the Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) with oligo(dT) primers. Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was conducted using iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Amplification products were analyzed on a CFX Connect™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Relative mRNA expression levels were calculated using the ΔΔCT method, with ama-1 or act-1 serving as reference genes for normalization. It minimizes potential errors caused by subtle fluctuations in a single housekeeping gene, thereby ensuring a more reliable normalization base. All biological replicates within each experiment were consistently normalized using ama-1 as the reference gene. The primers used for qRT-PCR in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
Endogenous ROS measurement
Measurement of ROS was performed as described [28]. Worms were transferred to 100 µL PBS-T (0.1% Tween 20) using L4-stage worms. The worms were frozen in liquid nitrogen and then sonicated for 20 s and 90 s, a process repeated five times. All samples were analyzed with five technical replicates in 96-well black-bottom, clear plates. Samples were incubated with 50 µM DCF-DA at 37 °C. Fluorescence was measured using the Victor 5 multilabel plate reader (Perkin Elmer, USA) with excitation at 485 nm and emission at 640 nm for 2 h, with readings taken every 10 min. The experiments were normalized to PBS-only samples, with five technical replicates for each condition.
Paraquat (PQ)-induced oxidative stress survival assay
L4-stage wild-type and acox-1.1(ok2257) worms were exposed to 1 mM PQ and basal conditions, with Day 0 corresponding to the L4 stage. For each experiment, 36 to 60 worms were used per biological repeat. All assays were performed with 3 or 4 independent replicates at 20 °C. Statistical analyses of lifespan curves were performed using the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test in Prism 10. Hazard ratios were calculated with the Cox proportional-hazard model.
Western blotting
Wild-type and transgenic worms were harvested following PQ treatment and lysed in Laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA) by boiling for 10 min. Equal amounts of protein were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Protein-transferred membranes were blocked with 5% (w/v) non-fat milk (Biotium, Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST) for 30 min at 25 °C. Primary antibodies (anti-total Ub, Santa Cruz 1:200, anti-Tub, 1:1000, DSHB AA4.3) were incubated overnight at 4 °C in 5% non-fat dry milk in TBST, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies (HRP-goat anti-mouse 1:5000, Invitrogen 31430) for 2 h at 25 °C. Western blot images were obtained using the LI-COR C-DiGit Chemiluminescence Western Blot Scanner and Image Studio software (LI-COR, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA).
Sample preparation for two-dimensional electrophoresis (2DE)
We performed as previously described [29]. Worms were washed with distilled water and resuspended in sample buffer A (50 mM Tris, 5 mM EDTA, 7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 4% CHAPS, and protease inhibitor). The suspensions were sonicated on ice for 30 s, and the soluble fractions were obtained by centrifugation at 36,000 × g for 40 min at 4 °C. Protein concentrations were determined using the Bradford method. Aliquots were stored at −70 °C until use. Protein samples (100 µg for analytical gels and 1 mg for preparative gels) were diluted in sample buffer B (7 M urea, 2 M thiourea, 2% v/v IPG buffer, pH 3–10 nonlinear (Amersham Biosciences), 2% CHAPS, 15 mM dithiothreitol, and a trace of bromophenol blue). The protein mixtures were applied onto IPG strips (Immobiline DryStrip, pH 3–10 nonlinear, 18 cm; Amersham Biosciences) prehydrated with the protein solution at 20 °C for 14 h. Isoelectric focusing (IEF) was performed at 20 °C with a current limit of 50 mA/strip using the following protocol [29]. After focusing, IPG strips were equilibrated for 20 min with gentle agitation in buffer containing 375 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.8), 6 M urea, 2% SDS, 5 mM tributyl phosphine, 2.5% acrylamide solution, and 20% glycerol. For the second dimension, vertical SDS-PAGE was performed using 9–16% gradient slab gels (180 × 200 × 1.5 mm). Equilibrated strips were trimmed and sealed onto the gels with 0.5% agarose in running buffer (24.8 mM Tris (pH 8.3), 192 mM glycine, 0.1% SDS, and a trace of bromophenol blue). Electrophoresis was performed at a constant current of 15 mA per gel. Gels were fixed in 40% methanol and 5% phosphoric acid for at least 1 h and stained overnight with Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250, destained, scanned using a GS-710 image scanner (Bio-Rad), and analyzed with Melanie 3 software (GeneBio).
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysis
We performed as previously described [29]. Protein spots were excised from the gels using pipette tips with the ends removed to accommodate varying diameters. Excised gel pieces that were transferred to microtubes were destained and dehydrated in 50 µL acetonitrile for 5 min at room temperature. The dried gels were rehydrated on ice for 45 min with 10 µL of trypsin solution (10 mg/mL in 25 mM ammonium bicarbonate, pH 8.0). Excess solution was removed, and proteins were digested at 37 °C for 24 h. The resulting peptides were extracted with POROS R2 beads [30] and analyzed using a Voyager DE Pro MALDI-TOF mass spectrometer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). For sample preparation, 0.5 µL of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid matrix solution was mixed with the peptide solution. Time-of-flight (TOF) measurements were performed under the following conditions: accelerating voltage of 20 kV, grid voltage of 75%, guide wire voltage of 0%, a delay time of 120 ns, and a low-mass gate of 500 Da. Internal calibration was performed using the autodigestion peaks of porcine trypsin (M + H+, m/z 842.5090 and 2211.1064). Peptide mass profiles were searched against the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database using MS-Fit 3.2 (University of California, San Francisco;1) and ProFound (version 4.7.0; The Rockefeller University;2), applying a mass tolerance of 20 ppm for measurements acquired in reflector mode.
Results
acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants exhibit enhanced oxidative stress resistance under mild chronic oxidative stress
To examine the effects of acox-1.1 deficiency on lifespan under oxidative stress, we compared the survival of wild-type and acox-1.1(ok2257) mutant worms under basal conditions and in the presence of 1 mM paraquat (PQ). Under normal growth conditions, acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants exhibited a significantly shorter mean lifespan than wild-type worms (Figures 1A,B), consistent with impaired metabolic homeostasis. Upon PQ treatment, wild-type worms showed a significant reduction in mean lifespan relative to untreated conditions (Figures 1A,B). In contrast, acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants did not exhibit PQ-induced lifespan reduction and instead maintained a comparable or slightly increased mean lifespan under oxidative stress (Figures 1A,B). Consistently, Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) analysis revealed that wild-type worms showed a significant difference in survival distributions with and without PQ treatment (p < 0.001), whereas acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants exhibited no significant difference under the same conditions (Figure 1A). Notably, acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants maintained high viability during early and mid-adult stages under PQ treatment, with a delayed onset of mortality compared to wild-type worms. These results indicate that loss of acox-1.1 confers enhanced resistance to oxidative stress, potentially through metabolic adaptations or activation of stress-response pathways. This interpretation is consistent with previous studies linking peroxisomal function to lifespan regulation in C. elegans [31] and supports the notion that metabolic rewiring in response to oxidative stress contributes to stress resistance and survival outcomes [31, 32].
FIGURE 1
Elevated endogenous H2O2 levels in acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants
Since acox-1.1 plays a role in peroxisomal β-oxidation, we next investigated whether its loss alters ROS homeostasis. Intracellular hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation was measured using DCF fluorescence intensity over a 2-h period (Figure 1C; Supplementary Figure S1). The results showed that acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants consistently exhibited higher DCF fluorescence intensity than wild-type controls at all time points, indicating a sustained increase in endogenous ROS levels. At 120 min, acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants displayed a marked elevation in fluorescence signal, suggesting a significant accumulation of ROS (p < 0.001) (Supplementary Figure S1). The continuous rise in fluorescence indicates that the loss of acox-1.1 disrupts peroxisomal function, leading to impaired H2O2 detoxification and an oxidative stress-prone cellular state. In previous studies, acox-1.1 (RNAi) did not significantly alter H2O2 levels compared with wild-type worms [31], whereas acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants accumulate internal ROS. Despite increased ROS levels, the prolonged survival of acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants under oxidative stress conditions implies the presence of adaptive mechanisms that mitigate ROS-induced damage, possibly through enhanced antioxidant defense or stress tolerance pathways.
Differential expression of ctl genes in acox-1(ok2257) mutants
Given that the acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants lead to elevated endogenous levels of ROS, we examined the expression of C. elegans catalase genes involved in ROS detoxification to assess potential compensatory responses. In C. elegans, ctl-1 encodes a cytosolic catalase, whereas ctl-2 and ctl-3 encode peroxisomal catalases, highlighting distinct subcellular localization among the family members [33]. Elevated catalase activity can mitigate tissue metabolic damage by reducing toxic H2O2 levels [34]. qRT-PCR analysis revealed that the expression of ctl-1 and ctl-2 genes remained unchanged (p > 0.05) compared to wild-type worms, whereas ctl-3 was significantly upregulated (p = 0.0006) (Figure 1D). These results suggest that loss of acox-1.1 alters the expression of ROS scavenging genes, with ctl-3 exhibiting the most pronounced induction, potentially compensating for increased ROS levels. Peroxisomes are increasingly recognized as key organelles in cellular adaptation to oxidative stress, given their capacity to both generate and detoxify ROS. Both ctl-1 and ctl-2 have been implicated in lifespan regulation [35], while the role of ctl-3 remains uncharacterized. A recent study demonstrated that peroxisomes actively participate in the cell-wide response to transient heat shock, revealing a critical role for organelle communication in coordinating organismal stress responses [36]. Under such extreme oxidative environments, the cell appears to shift its energetic priorities toward a survival-centric mode, prioritizing the clearance of oxidized proteins via specific antioxidant defenses such as CTL-3. We observed that the oxidative stress resistance of acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants is heavily dependent on this axis; indeed, ctl-3 RNAi completely abolishes this resistance and leads to a short lifespan (Figure 1E). This suggests that, in the face of severe oxidative stress, the failure of the Ub-proteasome system (UPS) complex assembly is superseded by a CTL-3-mediated stress clearance pathway to maintain cellular proteostasis and survival.
Transcriptional response to oxidative stress: acox-1.1 downregulation and oxidative stress gene mtl-1 upregulation
To assess the effect of oxidative stress on acox-1.1 transcription, we quantified acox-1.1 mRNA levels using qRT-PCR in wild-type worms with and without PQ treatment. As shown in Figure 1F, acox-1.1 expression was significantly downregulated in PQ-treated wild-type worms compared to untreated controls (p = 0.034). This result suggests that oxidative stress negatively regulates acox-1.1 transcription, possibly as part of a broader metabolic adaptation to ROS accumulation. We also analyzed the mRNA levels of gcs-1, ptps-1, gst-4, and mtl-1 to determine whether oxidative stress modulates the expression of key antioxidant defense genes (Figure 1G). Consistent with previous reports, SKN-1 target detoxification genes were suppressed under mild chronic oxidative stress, likely conserving energy to support adaptive responses rather than acute detoxification [20, 37]. Notably, only one of the daf-16 downstream genes, mtl-1, was significantly upregulated following PQ treatment. This finding suggests that acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants may adapt through preferential activation of DAF-16 rather than SKN-1 under mild chronic oxidative stress. Together, these findings indicate that oxidative stress triggers transcriptional alterations that downregulate acox-1.1 expression and induce a distinct ROS-response pathway from the canonical SKN-1-mediated oxidative stress defense, thereby enhancing stress resilience.
Proteomic analysis reveals reduced PAS-5 levels and oxidative stress-mediated suppression of ubiquitination in acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants
To identify proteins differentially expressed in acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants that may contribute to their oxidative stress-resistant lifespan extension, we performed two-dimensional (2D) gel electrophoresis to compare global protein expression profiles with wild-type worms (Figure 2A). Several protein spots displayed altered intensity in acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants, indicating widespread changes in protein abundance. Among the significantly altered proteins, PAS-5, a key regulatory subunit of the 20S proteasome, exhibited an approximately one-third reduction in acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants compared to wild-type worms. PAS-5 was detected in the wild-type proteome (white circle, left panel), whereas its levels were markedly diminished in acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants (right panel). In addition, CCO-2 (cytochrome c oxidase subunit 2, COX2) showed a notable increase in acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants. These changes were further validated by a zoomed-in analysis (Figure 2B). Given the essential role of PAS-5 in proteasome assembly and function, these findings suggest that peroxisomal dysfunction may indirectly impact proteostasis by modulating proteasomal activity, possibly through metabolic stress-induced alterations in protein turnover. Moreover, acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants manage ROS through SKN-1-independent pathways, potentially involving DAF-16, with increased mitochondrial CCO-2, supporting oxidative stress adaptation. Under basal conditions, reduced PAS-5 levels in acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants are associated with impaired proteostasis, as reflected by the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins, consistent with incomplete assembly or reduced activity of the 20S proteasome core. Surprisingly, upon exposure to low-dose oxidative stress, this phenotype is reversed, with a marked reduction in ubiquitin-conjugated protein smearing (Figures 2C,D). We suggested that this decrease in ubiquitinated substrate under oxidative stress does not reflect restored proteasome activity, but rather inhibition of the ubiquitination machinery itself. Elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) are known to oxidize critical cysteine residues within the catalytic sites of E1, E2, and E3 enzymes, thereby impairing ubiquitin activation and conjugation steps [38, 39]. Together, these findings suggested that PAS-5 downregulation and oxidative stress-mediated suppression of ubiquitination converge to reshape proteostasis in acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants.
FIGURE 2
Discussion
Based on our findings, we propose a mechanistic model (Figure 2E) in which loss of acox-1.1 disrupts VLCFA metabolism, leading to oxidative stress and endogenous ROS accumulation. The resulting oxidative stress activates compensatory detoxification mechanisms, including the induction of catalase, which neutralizes ROS, and modulation of the proteasome component PAS-5, potentially contributing to proteostasis regulation. Given that PAS-5 is a regulatory subunit of the 20S proteasome, the observed reduction in PAS-5 levels in acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants raises the question of whether proteasome activity is compromised under oxidative stress conditions. Future studies will be required to assess proteasome subunit composition and catalytic function in acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants. Ultimately, these findings suggest that oxidative stress establishes an adaptive threshold in acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants, allowing them to survive prolonged exposure to ROS by engaging antioxidant defenses and proteostasis mechanisms. Consistent with this model, RNAi-mediated depletion of ctl-3 abolishes the oxidative resilience of acox-1.1(ok2257) mutants, indicating that catalase-dependent antioxidant defense is essential for their adaptive survival under oxidative stress. Further investigations, including genetic epistasis analyses and proteasome activity assays, will be necessary to fully elucidate the regulatory interplay between metabolic stress, proteasome function, and oxidative stress adaptation.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data has been deposited in Figshare (DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.31545961).
Ethics statement
The manuscript presents research on animals that do not require ethical approval for their study.
Author contributions
WB: study design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, draft of article. MN: acquisition of data. ML: study design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, revising of article. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This research was funded by the National Research Foundation of Korea (2011-0028112) to YPRC. 2DE and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry experiments were conducted at the Yonsei Proteome Research Center (YPRC) under the support of Dr. Young-Ki Paik.
Acknowledgments
We also thank the YPRC for their assistance and the Department of Internal Medicine (BSOM at ECU) for supporting the publication fees.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.ebm-journal.org/articles/10.3389/ebm.2026.10796/full#supplementary-material
References
1.
FransenMNordgrenMWangBApanasetsO. Role of peroxisomes in ROS/RNS-metabolism: implications for human disease. Biochim Biophys Acta (2012) 1822(9):1363–73. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.12.001
2.
SchraderMFahimiHD. Peroxisomes and oxidative stress. Biochim Biophys Acta (2006) 1763(12):1755–66. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.09.006
3.
SewelamNJaspertNVan Der KelenKTognettiVBSchmitzJFrerigmannHet alSpatial H2O2 signaling specificity: H2O2 from chloroplasts and peroxisomes modulates the plant transcriptome differentially. Mol Plant (2014) 7(7):1191–210. 10.1093/mp/ssu070
4.
Lopez-ErauskinJGalinoJRuizMCuezvaJMFabregatICacabelosDet alImpaired mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in the peroxisomal disease X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy. Hum Molecular Genetics (2013) 22(16):3296–305. 10.1093/hmg/ddt186
5.
NordgrenMFransenM. Peroxisomal metabolism and oxidative stress. Biochimie (2014) 98:56–62. 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.07.026
6.
AntonenkovVDGrunauSOhlmeierSHiltunenJK. Peroxisomes are oxidative organelles. Antioxid and Redox Signaling (2010) 13(4):525–37. 10.1089/ars.2009.2996
7.
del RioLASandalioLMCorpasFJPalmaJMBarrosoJB. Reactive oxygen species and reactive nitrogen species in peroxisomes. Production, scavenging, and role in cell signaling. Plant Physiology (2006) 141(2):330–5. 10.1104/pp.106.078204
8.
PickeringAMStaabTATowerJSieburthDDaviesKJ. A conserved role for the 20S proteasome and Nrf2 transcription factor in oxidative stress adaptation in mammals, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster. The J Experimental Biology (2013) 216(Pt 4):543–53. 10.1242/jeb.074757
9.
LaunayNRuizMFourcadeSSchluterAGuileraCFerrerIet alOxidative stress regulates the ubiquitin-proteasome system and immunoproteasome functioning in a mouse model of X-adrenoleukodystrophy. Brain (2013) 136(Pt 3):891–904. 10.1093/brain/aws370
10.
TsakiriENSykiotisGPPapassideriISTerposEDimopoulosMAGorgoulisVGet alProteasome dysfunction in Drosophila signals to an Nrf2-dependent regulatory circuit aiming to restore proteostasis and prevent premature aging. Aging Cell (2013) 12(5):802–13. 10.1111/acel.12111
11.
PapaevgeniouNChondrogianniN. The ubiquitin proteasome system in Caenorhabditis elegans and its regulation. Redox Biology (2014) 2:333–47. 10.1016/j.redox.2014.01.007
12.
SonninenTMGoldsteinsGLaham-KaramNKoistinahoJLehtonenS. Proteostasis disturbances and inflammation in neurodegenerative diseases. Cells (2020) 9(10). 10.3390/cells9102183
13.
ShangFTaylorA. Ubiquitin-proteasome pathway and cellular responses to oxidative stress. Free Radical Biology and Medicine (2011) 51(1):5–16. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.03.031
14.
Ben-NissanGSharonM. Regulating the 20S proteasome ubiquitin-independent degradation pathway. Biomolecules (2014) 4(3):862–84. 10.3390/biom4030862
15.
SaezIVilchezD. The mechanistic links between proteasome activity, aging and age-related diseases. Curr Genomics (2014) 15(1):38–51. 10.2174/138920291501140306113344
16.
KahnNWReaSLMoyleSKellAJohnsonTE. Proteasomal dysfunction activates the transcription factor SKN-1 and produces a selective oxidative-stress response in Caenorhabditis elegans. The Biochem Journal (2008) 409(1):205–13. 10.1042/BJ20070521
17.
ArczewskaKDTomazellaGGLindvallJMKassahunHMaglioniSTorgovnickAet alActive transcriptomic and proteomic reprogramming in the C. elegans nucleotide excision repair mutant xpa-1. Nucleic Acids Research (2013) 41(10):5368–81. 10.1093/nar/gkt225
18.
BlackwellTKSteinbaughMJHourihanJMEwaldCYIsikM. SKN-1/Nrf, stress responses, and aging in Caenorhabditis elegans. Free Radical Biology and Medicine (2015) 88(Pt B):290–301. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.06.008
19.
AnJHBlackwellTK. SKN-1 links C. elegans mesendodermal specification to a conserved oxidative stress response. Genes and Development (2003) 17(15):1882–93. 10.1101/gad.1107803
20.
NhanJDTurnerCDAndersonSMYenCADaltonHMCheesmanHKet alRedirection of SKN-1 abates the negative metabolic outcomes of a perceived pathogen infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2019) 116(44):22322–30. 10.1073/pnas.1909666116
21.
LeeSJHwangABKenyonC. Inhibition of respiration extends C. elegans life span via reactive oxygen species that increase HIF-1 activity. Curr Biology : CB (2010) 20(23):2131–6. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.057
22.
ParkSKTedescoPMJohnsonTE. Oxidative stress and longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans as mediated by SKN-1. Aging Cell (2009) 8(3):258–69. 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2009.00473.x
23.
WojtovichAPFosterTH. Optogenetic control of ROS production. Redox Biology (2014) 2:368–76. 10.1016/j.redox.2014.01.019
24.
MaldonadoEMorales-PisonSUrbinaFSolariA. Aging hallmarks and the role of oxidative stress. Antioxidants (Basel) (2023) 12(3):651. 10.3390/antiox12030651
25.
KimJHuangKVoPTTMiaoTCorreiaJKumarAet alPeroxisomal import stress activates integrated stress response and inhibits ribosome biogenesis. PNAS Nexus (2024) 3(10):pgae429. 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae429
26.
RacklesEWittingMForneIZhangXZacherlJSchrottSet alReduced peroxisomal import triggers peroxisomal retrograde signaling. Cell Reports (2021) 34(3):108653. 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108653
27.
BrennerS. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics (1974) 77(1):71–94. 10.1093/genetics/77.1.71
28.
YoonDSLeeMHChaDS. Measurement of intracellular ROS in Caenorhabditis elegans using 2',7'-Dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate. Bio-protocol (2018) 8(6). 10.21769/BioProtoc.2774
29.
ChoiBKChitwoodDJPaikYK. Proteomic changes during disturbance of cholesterol metabolism by azacoprostane treatment in Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol and Cellular Proteomics : MCP (2003) 2(10):1086–95. 10.1074/mcp.M300036-MCP200
30.
LarsenMRSorensenGLFeySJLarsenPMRoepstorffP. Phospho-proteomics: evaluation of the use of enzymatic de-phosphorylation and differential mass spectrometric peptide mass mapping for site specific phosphorylation assignment in proteins separated by gel electrophoresis. Proteomics (2001) 1(2):223–38. 10.1002/1615-9861(200102)1:2<223::AID-PROT223>3.0.CO;2-B
31.
WuNMaYCGongXQZhaoPJJiaYJZhaoQet alThe metabolite alpha-ketobutyrate extends lifespan by promoting peroxisomal function in C. elegans. Nat Communications (2023) 14(1):240. 10.1038/s41467-023-35899-1
32.
Lopez-OtinCGalluzziLFreijeJMPMadeoFKroemerG. Metabolic control of longevity. Cell (2016) 166(4):802–21. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.031
33.
PetrivOIRachubinskiRA. Lack of peroxisomal catalase causes a progeric phenotype in Caenorhabditis elegans. The J Biological Chemistry (2004) 279(19):19996–20001. 10.1074/jbc.M400207200
34.
ZamockyMFurtmullerPGObingerC. Evolution of catalases from bacteria to humans. Antioxid and Redox Signaling (2008) 10(9):1527–48. 10.1089/ars.2008.2046
35.
TaubJLauJFMaCHahnJHHoqueRRothblattJet alA cytosolic catalase is needed to extend adult lifespan in C. elegans daf-C and clk-1 mutants. Nature (2003) 421(6924):764. 10.1038/nature01425
36.
MusaMDionisioPACasqueiroRMilosevicIRaimundoNKriskoA. Lack of peroxisomal catalase affects heat shock response in Caenorhabditis elegans. Life Science Alliance (2023) 6(1):e202201737. 10.26508/lsa.202201737
37.
TurnerCDRamosCMCurranSP. Disrupting the SKN-1 homeostat: mechanistic insights and phenotypic outcomes. Front Aging (2024) 5:1369740. 10.3389/fragi.2024.1369740
38.
FreyJRGeleickHDeweckA. Immunological tolerance induced in animals previously sensitized to simple chemical compounds. Science (1964) 144(3620):853–4. 10.1126/science.144.3620.853
39.
BogenhagenDFMartinDWKollerA. Initial steps in RNA processing and ribosome assembly occur at mitochondrial DNA nucleoids. Cell Metabolism (2014) 19(4):618–29. 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.013
Summary
Keywords
C. elegans aging, catalase (CTL-3), oxidative stress adaptation, peroxisomal β-oxidation, proteasome dysfunction
Citation
Bae W, Norman M and Lee MH (2026) Enhanced oxidative stress resilience in C. elegans acox-1.1 mutants through CTL-3 and proteasomal regulation. Exp. Biol. Med. 251:10796. doi: 10.3389/ebm.2026.10796
Received
20 August 2025
Revised
10 February 2026
Accepted
06 March 2026
Published
13 March 2026
Volume
251 - 2026
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Bae, Norman and Lee.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Woori Bae, woori.bae@nyulangone.org; Myon Hee Lee, leemy@ecu.edu
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.