Abstract
It is known that gut microbiota dysbiosis can lead to obesity by disrupting energy consumption and metabolism. Probiotic supplements are a potential therapeutic option for improving intestinal homeostasis. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a probiotic supplement containing Bifidobacterium bifidum on the intestinal microbiome of people with obesity using high-throughput sequencing on the DNBSEQ-G50 platform. The study demonstrated a positive effect of the supplement on bacterial species such as Bacteroides uniformis, Alistipes putredinis, Alistipes shahii, Dysosmobacter welbionis, and Gemmiger formicilis. Therefore, we suggest the potential use of this bacterial species in the treatment of gut microbiota dysbiosis of obese individuals.
Impact statement
Why is the work submitted important to the field? This work addresses a gap in understanding how specific probiotic interventions can therapeutically modulate gut dysbiosis in obesity. Since obesity-related metabolic disorders are increasingly recognized as having a microbial component, demonstrating that a single probiotic strain can predictably shift the microbial community toward beneficial species provides a foundation for targeted therapeutic approaches rather than broad, non-specific interventions. How does the work submitted advance the field? The study advances from observational correlations between microbiome composition and obesity to demonstrating causal intervention effects. By using high-throughput sequencing to track species-level changes, it moves beyond genus-level descriptions that dominated earlier probiotic research. The identification of specific bacterial species that respond to Bifidobacterium bifidum supplementation creates a measurable framework for evaluating probiotic efficacy and establishes biomarkers for treatment response. What new information does this work impart to the field? The work provides concrete evidence that Bifidobacterium bifidum supplementation promotes four specific beneficial species while suppressing a metabolically unfavorable one. This species-level resolution reveals the ecological dynamics of probiotic action—showing that probiotics don't simply colonize but rather reshape the existing community structure. The observed increase in alpha diversity suggests that the probiotic acts as an “ecological” engineer, creating conditions that support broader microbial diversity rather than simply displacing existing species. How does this new information impact the field? This information enables more rational probiotic selection for obesity management and provides mechanistic insight into how probiotics exert metabolic benefits. Researchers can now design studies targeting these specific microbial shifts, develop diagnostic tools to identify patients most likely to respond, and potentially combine probiotics with other interventions that support these beneficial species. It transforms probiotic therapy from empirical treatment to precision intervention.
Introduction
In recent years, one of the significant problems for humanity in developed countries is obesity, which can increase the risk of developing hypertension, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases [1]. Moreover, a significant portion of previous studies have shown that people diagnosed with obesity have changes in the composition of their intestinal microbiota [2]. However, solving this problem is complicated by the fact that obesity has a complex etiology, including both genetic and environmental factors [3].
One treatment option is the use of probiotics to alter the composition of the intestinal microbiota [4]. In turn, probiotics, due to their ability to regulate intestinal microbiota, can have a beneficial effect on the intestines of people who are overweight or obese, but the mechanisms of their action are not fully understood and require further research [5].
In the human body, Bifidobacterium is one of the key intestinal commensals capable of providing various health benefits; due to these properties, these bacteria are widely used as probiotics [6].
The beneficial role of this bacterial species is supported by studies using a supplement containing Bifidobacterium longum to protect the host from metabolic syndromes, including diet-induced obesity [7]. This is supported by studies noting that the bacterial species Bifidobacterium is significantly lower in overweight/obese children compared to normal weight children, suggesting that it is involved in fat accumulation and obesity [8].
Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of a probiotic supplement containing Bifidobacterium bifidum on the gut of people diagnosed with obesity.
Materials and methods
Object of study
At first, patients completed a questionnaire that included the following questions: age, diet, physical activity, history of infectious and non-infectious diseases, medication use, including hormonal and antibacterial medications (over the past 6 months), anthropometric parameters [height, weight for calculating body mass index (BMI)] and waist circumference (WC). Based on the questionnaire results, 14 patients with a BMI greater than 30 were selected. The average age of the group was 38 years.
During the first phase of the study, stool samples (at least 1 g) were collected from patients included in the study group. Then, without changing their usual diet, they took a probiotic supplement containing B. bifidum VSUET22 (5 × 108 CFU) twice daily with food for 2 weeks. After completing the 2-week supplementation period, stool samples were collected for further molecular genetic testing.
DNA extraction
Total DNA was isolated from each fecal sample obtained using a commercial HiPure Microbiome DNA Kit (Magen, China).
Total DNA quantification was performed using a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Fisher, USA) and a QuDye® HS Double-Stranded DNA Assay Kit (Lumiprobe, Russia). Purity and impurity assessment were performed using a Nano-500 Spectrophotometer (Allsheng, China) at 230, 260, and 280 nm, applying 2 µL of the resulting DNA sample to the detector.
All manipulations were carried out according to the protocols of the manufacturers of commercial kits.
Library preparation and sequencing on the DNBSEQ-G50 platform
The commercial MGIEasy Fast FS DNA Library Prep Set User Manual and UDB Primer Adapter Kit were used for library preparation. Circularization of single-stranded DNA was performed using the MGIEasy Dual Barcode Circularization Module (MGI, China). Subsequent DNA generation and cartridge loading were performed using the FCL PE100/FCS PE 150 DNBSEQ-G50RS High-throughput Sequencing Kit (MGI, China). Further sequencing was performed using the FCL DNBSEQ-G50RS Sequencing Flow Cell. All manipulations were performed according to the manufacturer’s protocols.
Bioinformatic and statistical data analysis for the DNBSEQ-G50 platform
Raw metagenomic read quality was evaluated with FastQC (v0.12.1). Adapter and other technical sequences were removed using flexbar (v3.5.0). To deplete host-derived reads, sequences were mapped with Bowtie2 against the human (GCF_000001405.40) reference genomes, and matching reads were discarded. Taxonomic composition was inferred with MetaPhlAn 4 (v4.1.1) using the default bacterial, viral, and eukaryotic marker databases. Microbial functional potential and pathway abundances were profiled with HUMAnN. Antibiotic resistance gene content was characterized with GROOT using a ARG-ANNOT index.
Statistics
Statistical analysis was performed in R (Version 4.5.1). Alpha diversity was assessed using the Shannon index, followed by the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. Beta diversity was analyzed using the Bray-Curtis distance metric, followed by the ADONIS function. For a more detailed analysis of pairwise comparisons between groups, PERMANOVA was used. Differences in the relative abundance of bacterial species between groups were analyzed using the ANCOMBC method (Version 2.11.1).
Results were considered statistically significant at an adjusted p-value ≤0.05. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
Results
Analysis of the fecal microbiome of patients before and after taking B. bifidum identified 8 phyla, 26 classes, 29 orders, 41 families, 107 genera, and 170 species of bacteria.
We conducted a comparative analysis of the microbiome of the study groups, during which we identified 73 of the most common species, the number of which exceeded 1%, all other species were grouped as “Others” (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1
Bacterial species found in the microbiome of the study groups.
An alpha diversity analysis was also performed using measures of observed species diversity and the Shannon index (Figure 2). Statistically significant differences in the Shannon index (2.77 ± 0.73 vs. 3.60 ± 0.29, p = 0.007) were found between the gut microbiomes of patients before and after Bifidobacterium bifidum administration, respectively.
FIGURE 2
Alpha diversity of the intestinal microbiome of patients before and after taking Bifidobacterium bifidum. **p ≤ 0.01.
Beta diversity analysis also showed the presence of clustering between the studied groups, however, no statistically significant differences were found p = 0.166 (Figure 3).
FIGURE 3
Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) plot of beta diversity based on the Bray-Curtis scale between study groups.
Differential abundance analysis revealed statistically significant differences at the species level between the microbiome of patients before and after taking Bifidobacterium bifidum. Thus, in patients after taking the supplement, we observed an increase in the number of species: Bacteroides uniformis (2.91% ± 1.23 vs. 4.76% ± 0.96, p = 0.03), Alistipes putredinis (1.39% ± 0.57 vs. 3.68% ± 1.08, p = 0.04), Alistipes shahii (0.51% ± 0.28 vs. 1.24% ± 0.32, p = 0.04), Dysosmobacter welbionis (0.09% ± 0.06 vs. 0.47% ± 0.13, p = 0.01). In contrast, the relative abundance of Gemmiger formicilis was reduced by probiotic supplementation compared to pre-supplementation levels (5.98% ± 2.25 vs. 1.57% ± 0.44, p = 4.42E-06) (Figure 4).
FIGURE 4
Differences in the composition of the intestinal microbiome of patients before and after taking Bifidobacterium bifidum. *p ≤ 0.05, ***p ≤ 0.001.
Discussion
After consumption of Bifidobacterium bifidum, an increase in the relative content of Bacteroides uniformis, Alistipes putredinis, Alistipes shahii, Dysosmobacter welbionis was observed. An increase in the relative amount of Gemmiger formicilis was also observed. Changes toward an increase in bacteria producing short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), such as acetate, propionate, and butyrate, are of particular interest in the context of metabolic health. SCFAs are key mediators of microbiota-host interactions: they serve as a major energy source for colonocytes, strengthen the intestinal barrier, have anti-inflammatory properties, and regulate energy homeostasis [9]. Thus, the observed shift may be one of the mechanisms by which the probiotic exerts a potentially beneficial effect in obesity.
One possible explanation is that bifidobacteria ferment carbohydrates into short-chain fatty acids. These metabolites can then be utilized as substrates by Bacteroides and Alistipes, which are able to metabolize them. The bacterial species G. formicilis is known to produce butyric acid, a short-chain fatty acid, in the body and has also been shown to be reduced in abundance in inflammatory bowel disease [10, 11]. However, the abundance of the bacterial species G. formicilis is associated with a higher risk of developing colitis [12]. In turn, a study of patients with colorectal cancer showed a decrease in this bacterial species in the group of patients with a positive test for the presence of blood in the stool [13]. Also, in a study of type 2 diabetes mellitus, an increase in the number of this species relative to the control group was recorded after 12 weeks of therapy [14]. Gemmiger formicilis was also found to be abundant in a group of patients with chronic heart disease who suffered from headache due to excessive use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, relative to the control group [15]. Our study showed a decrease in the abundance of this bacterial species when taking a probiotic supplement containing B. bifidum. Thus, it is difficult to unambiguously interpret the influence of bacteria of this species on the development of obesity.
Bacteroides uniformis is considered a beneficial species for the host organism, as it is capable of producing short-chain fatty acids and other metabolites [16]. B. uniformis abundance was shown to be reduced in metabolically associated fatty liver disease and was also negatively correlated with hepatosteatosis and BMI [17]. It was also shown that the abundance of this bacterial species was significantly higher in healthy controls compared to patients with ulcerative colitis [18]. Previously, the possibility of using representatives of this bacterial species as a new probiotic bacterium in the treatment of colon diseases associated with dysbacteriosis was proposed [18]. Our study also observed an increase in B. uniformis abundance in a group of patients after taking a probiotic supplement containing B. bifidum, which is consistent with other studies.
The genus Alistipes is often associated with anti-inflammatory effects in certain cardiovascular diseases, colitis, liver fibrosis, and cancer immunotherapy. However, there is also evidence suggesting pathogenicity in colorectal cancer and its association with mental disorders [19]. The bacterial species A. putredinis is a potentially beneficial member of the gut microbiota associated with metabolic health [20, 21]. An increase in this bacterial species has been shown after mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis, as well as the contribution of A. putredinis to amino acid metabolic pathways [22]. However, at the same time, a link was found between increased transcriptional activity of A. putredinis and increased severity of Crohn’s disease [23]. An increase in the number of this bacterial species was observed after taking a probiotic supplement containing B. bifidum. The dual role of this type of bacteria in the development of various diseases does not allow us to draw a clear conclusion regarding the influence of A. putredinis on the pathogenesis of obesity.
Representatives of the species A. shahii have a negative correlation with the inflammatory process [24]. The increase in the number of A. shahii is associated with a positive effect on the state of the intestine: improvement of the epithelial barrier and changes in metabolites in feces [25]. Low abundance of this species is observed in ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease [26]. Our study found an increase in A. shahii abundance after probiotic supplementation. Thus, it can be assumed that the intake of probiotics had a positive effect on the number of beneficial bacteria of the A. shahii species.
Dysosmobacter welbionis is a recently described commensal bacteria being studied as a promising new probiotic due to its ability to produce butyrate. In a mouse study, oral administration of live Dysosmobacter welbionis J115T partially prevented the development of insulin resistance and inflammation in white and brown adipose tissue. The protective effect was associated with an increase in mitochondria and activation of nonshivering thermogenesis in brown adipose tissue [27]. Low abundance of D. welbionis is often associated with pathological conditions such as obesity and diabetes [28]. Our study showed that taking a probiotic supplement containing B. bifidum was associated with a significant increase in this bacterial species. This is consistent with literature data and suggests that taking this probiotic promotes normalization of the intestinal microbiota.
A critical limitation of short-term probiotic use is the stability and prolongation of microbiota restructuring. The presence of probiotic microorganisms in the intestine can often be transient. Their numbers fluctuate depending on whether or not they are discontinued, and the microbiota often strives to return to its usual homeostasis. A study [29] demonstrates the effect of probiotics on microbiota restoration and emphasizes that this effect may be context-dependent and does not necessarily lead to long-term community restructuring after completion of the course. The ability of probiotic strains to establish themselves is also associated with the initial microbiota [30], which limits the possibility of long-term colonization with short courses of probiotic use. Therefore, further research is needed to show changes in the intestinal microbiota of people with obesity over a long period of time after consumption of B. bifidum.
Our results suggest that the B. bifidum strain has the potential to correct dysbiotic disturbances in the microbial community in obesity. A change in microbial composition toward an increased proportion of beneficial commensals may be one of the mechanisms underlying the beneficial effects of probiotics on metabolism.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/?term=PRJNA1353102, NCBI BioProject PRJNA1353102.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by Ethics Committee of the Voronezh State University of Engineering Technologies (Protocol No. 1 dated May 9, 2024). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
IB, YS, and PM: writing – original draft, methodology, investigation; YS: data curation, writing – review and editing; OKr and TK – methodology, resources. MS and OKo: conceptualization, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. The research was carried out within the state assignment of Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (project FZGW-2024-0003).
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
References
1.
GongHGaoHRenQHeJ. The abundance of bifidobacterium in relation to visceral obesity and serum uric acid. Sci Rep (2022) 12:1–7. 10.1038/s41598-022-17417-3
2.
CrovesyLMastersonDRosadoEL. Profile of the gut microbiota of adults with obesity: a systematic review. Eur J Clin Nutr (2020) 74(74):1251–62. 10.1038/s41430-020-0607-6
3.
AhmadJKhanIZenginGMahomoodallyMF. The gut microbiome in the fight against obesity: the potential of dietary factors. FASEB J (2023) 37:e23258. 10.1096/FJ.202300864RR
4.
GengJNiQSunWLiLFengX. The links between gut microbiota and obesity and obesity related diseases. Biomed Pharmacother (2022) 147:112678. 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112678
5.
BaiZWuYGaoDDongYPanYGuS. Gut microbiome and metabolome alterations in overweight or Obese adult population after weight-loss Bifidobacterium breve BBr60 intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Mol Sci (2024) 25:10871. 10.3390/IJMS252010871
6.
LuJZhangLZhangHChenYZhaoJChenWet alPopulation-level variation in gut bifidobacterial composition and association with geography, age, ethnicity, and staple food. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes (2023) 9:1–12. 10.1038/s41522-023-00467-4
7.
KimGYoonYParkJHParkJWNohMKimHet alBifidobacterial carbohydrate/nucleoside metabolism enhances oxidative phosphorylation in white adipose tissue to protect against diet-induced obesity. Microbiome (2022) 10:1–21. 10.1186/s40168-022-01374-0
8.
ZhangSDangY. Roles of gut microbiota and metabolites in overweight and obesity of children. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) (2022) 13:994930. 10.3389/FENDO.2022.994930
9.
NisaPKirthiAVSinhaP. Microbiome-based approaches to personalized nutrition: from gut health to disease prevention. Folia Microbiol (Praha) (2025) 70:961–78. 10.1007/s12223-025-01337-6
10.
BamigbadeGBSubhashAJAl-RamadiBKamal-EldinAGanRYLiuSQet alGut microbiota modulation, prebiotic and bioactive characteristics of date pomace polysaccharides extracted by microwave-assisted deep eutectic solvent. Int J Biol Macromol (2024) 262:130167. 10.1016/J.IJBIOMAC.2024.130167
11.
NingLZhouYLSunHZhangYShenCWangZet alMicrobiome and metabolome features in inflammatory bowel disease via multi-omics integration analyses across cohorts. Nat Commun (2023) 14:1–17. 10.1038/s41467-023-42788-0
12.
HayaseEJenqRR. Role of the intestinal microbiome and microbial-derived metabolites in immune checkpoint blockade immunotherapy of cancer. Genome Med (2021) 13:1–11. 10.1186/s13073-021-00923-w
13.
ChénardTMalickMDubéJMasséE. The influence of blood on the human gut microbiome. BMC Microbiol (2020) 20. 10.1186/S12866-020-01724-8
14.
KalkanATYorulmazGAkalinADinleyiciEC. Intestinal microbiota composition in patients with type 2 diabetes and effects of oral antidiabetics. J Clin Med (2025) 14:2786. 10.3390/JCM14082786
15.
VuralliDCeren AkgorMDagidirHGOnatPYalinayMSezermanUet alMicrobiota alterations are related to migraine food triggers and inflammatory markers in chronic migraine patients with medication overuse headache. J Headache Pain (2024) 25:192. 10.1186/S10194-024-01891-3
16.
TanHZhaiQChenW. Investigations of Bacteroides spp. towards next-generation probiotics. Food Res Int (2019) 116:637–44. 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.08.088
17.
ZhangDYLiDChenSJZhangLJZhuXLChenFet alBacteroides uniformis-generated hexadecanedioic acid ameliorates metabolic-associated fatty liver disease. Gut Microbes (2025) 17:2508433. 10.1080/19490976.2025.2508433
18.
DaiWZhangJChenLYuJZhangJYinHet alDiscovery of Bacteroides uniformis F18-22 as a safe and novel probiotic bacterium for the treatment of ulcerative colitis from the healthy human Colon. Int J Mol Sci (2023) 24:14669. 10.3390/IJMS241914669
19.
ParkerBJWearschPAVelooACMRodriguez-PalaciosA. The genus alistipes: gut bacteria with emerging implications to inflammation, cancer, and mental health. Front Immunol (2020) 11:906. 10.3389/FIMMU.2020.00906
20.
ZhangSWangRZhaoRLuYXuMLinXet alAlistipes putredinis ameliorates metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease in rats via gut microbiota remodeling and inflammatory suppression. Nutrients (2025) 17:2013. 10.3390/nu17122013
21.
SchwengerKJPSharmaDGhorbaniYXuWLouWComelliEMet alLinks between gut microbiome, metabolome, clinical variables and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease severity in bariatric patients. Liver Int (2024) 44:1176–88. 10.1111/liv.15864
22.
WuJLiMZhouCRongJZhangFWenYet alChanges in amino acid concentrations and the gut microbiota composition are implicated in the mucosal healing of ulcerative colitis and can be used as noninvasive diagnostic biomarkers. Clin Proteomics (2024) 21:62. 10.1186/S12014-024-09513-5
23.
SchirmerMFranzosaEALloyd-PriceJMcIverLJSchwagerRPoonTWet alDynamics of metatranscription in the inflammatory bowel disease gut microbiome. Nat Microbiol (2018) 3:337–46. 10.1038/s41564-017-0089-z
24.
SchirmerMGarnerAVlamakisHXavierRJ. Microbial genes and pathways in inflammatory bowel disease. Nat Rev Microbiol (2019) 17:497–511. 10.1038/s41579-019-0213-6
25.
LinXXuMLanRHuDZhangSZhangSet alGut commensal Alistipes shahii improves experimental colitis in mice with reduced intestinal epithelial damage and cytokine secretion. mSystems (2025) 10:e0160724. 10.1128/MSYSTEMS.01607-24
26.
Lloyd-PriceJArzeCAnanthakrishnanANSchirmerMAvila-PachecoJPoonTWet alMulti-omics of the gut microbial ecosystem in inflammatory bowel diseases. Nature (2019) 569:655–62. 10.1038/s41586-019-1237-9
27.
Le RoyTMoensDHEVan HulMPaquotAPelicaenRRégnierMet alDysosmobacter welbionis is a newly isolated human commensal bacterium preventing diet-induced obesity and metabolic disorders in mice. Gut (2022) 71:534–43. 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323778
28.
Moens de HaseENeyrinckAMRodriguezJCnopMPaquotNThissenJPet alImpact of metformin and Dysosmobacter welbionis on diet-induced obesity and diabetes: from clinical observation to preclinical intervention. Diabetologia (2024) 67:333–45. 10.1007/s00125-023-06032-0
29.
SuezJZmoraNZilberman-SchapiraGMorUDori-BachashMBashiardesSet alPost-antibiotic gut mucosal microbiome reconstitution is impaired by probiotics and improved by autologous FMT. Cell (2018) 174:1406–23.e16. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.047
30.
ZmoraNZilberman-SchapiraGSuezJMorUDori-BachashMBashiardesSet alPersonalized gut mucosal colonization resistance to empiric probiotics is associated with unique host and microbiome features. Cell (2018) 174:1388–405.e21. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.041
Summary
Keywords
Bifidobacterium bifidum, high-throughput sequencing, microbiome, obesity, probiotics
Citation
Burakova I, Smirnova Y, Morozova P, Pogorelova S, Kryukova O, Kislova T, Korneeva O and Syromyatnikov M (2026) The effect of short-term consumption of Bifidobacterium bifidum on the gut microbiome of obese individuals. Exp. Biol. Med. 251:10894. doi: 10.3389/ebm.2026.10894
Received
13 November 2025
Revised
19 January 2026
Accepted
09 February 2026
Published
23 February 2026
Volume
251 - 2026
Updates
Copyright
© 2026 Burakova, Smirnova, Morozova, Pogorelova, Kryukova, Kislova, Korneeva and Syromyatnikov.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mikhail Syromyatnikov, syromyatnikov@bio.vsu.ru
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.